The difference between zerowaste and landfilling

As we know, human beings are producing lots of rubbish everyday, which is quite difficult to handle with. Some countries choose landfilling, some choose the other disposal scheme called zero waste, which would abolish and reduce dramatically the need for incinerators. Here, lets compare these two kinds of systems.
For landfilling, it's quite cheap and easy. Workers should only dig a deep hole and fill it with rubbish, then everything is done.However, there are many negative aspects to do this .Landingfilling will occupy lots of lands. For most rubbish, it will take about 10 years to disappear. Some will take even longer time. What's more, lots of rubbish like batteries are poisonious. They can pollurte the earth and water.
In contrast, zero waste can bring much more profite. It won't cause any pollution because everything is going to be reused and recycled. At the same time, people can get profit from turning waste into an asset. However, zero waste is not an easy way to go. It needs the government to set up lots of factories for hanaling waste. New high-technology are required to reuse or recycle waste. All of these needs a huge revenue.
So, in my opinion, for China, landfill is still the way we should use. The reason is that China is a developing country. The government cannot pay too much to handle daily waste. It's better to choose an easy and cheap way to do so.